Editorial standards
Useful first. Clear about how it was made.
These are the standards Raising TMRW intends to use as editorial work develops. They are commitments and a review workflow—not accreditation, clinical review or proof that family trials have occurred.
AI-assisted creation
AI may help generate, organize or refine drafts. It does not become a named expert, parent witness or source. We will label meaningful AI assistance and keep a person accountable for publication.
Sources and review
Research claims require a real traceable source. Authors and reviewers are named only when they actually contributed. Safety, health and serious developmental topics require appropriate human review before publication.
Practical Mission checks
Before publication, a Mission should be checked for a clear age band, ordinary materials, setup, adult role, safety notes, a small starting point and a dignified way to stop or adapt.
Children’s dignity
Children are never the joke. We do not shame parents, ridicule mistakes or use fear about AI and falling behind. Images and stories must not imply a real family endorsement when none exists.
Product independence
Product suggestions must be visible, relevant and optional. Every concept includes a no-purchase household alternative. Editorial choices should not secretly steer a family toward a product.
What still needs proving
Sample Missions are not a validated child-development program. A future small-family home pilot would examine setup time, adult effort, child engagement, repeat choice and product-versus-envelope use without turning those observations into clinical claims.
Nothing on this review site replaces a parent’s judgment or professional advice. Near-action safety and adult-role guidance stays with each Mission.
Read the prototype data note →